Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261539AbVBRWgM (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Feb 2005 17:36:12 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261540AbVBRWgM (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Feb 2005 17:36:12 -0500 Received: from rproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.170.207]:16073 "EHLO rproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261539AbVBRWgK (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Feb 2005 17:36:10 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=jvl18IF/WRlPA/EezSGS4yNddIttryU8fcKZF1FDDVSgfS9rw6dVjsKAtdVUIQJXlN3F8mCIxyOlrv+pUKqxb3m307AguYtUqqwal316t4R7pagcWiGjWDqR9rOFW7+eN2NfhjX2PonSpgbFNSiqhjy6sTD8yaZmiDXoSh4th6k= Message-ID: Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 17:35:11 -0500 From: Dmitry Torokhov Reply-To: dtor_core@ameritech.net To: Vojtech Pavlik Subject: Re: [BK] upgrade will be needed Cc: Anton Altaparmakov , "d.c" , "David S. Miller" , seanlkml@sympatico.ca, tytso@mit.edu, vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl, cfriesen@nortel.com, cs@tequila.co.jp, galibert@pobox.com, kernel@crazytrain.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20050218221819.GA3864@ucw.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <4912.10.10.10.24.1108675441.squirrel@linux1> <200502180142.j1I1gJXC007648@laptop11.inf.utfsm.cl> <1451.10.10.10.24.1108713140.squirrel@linux1> <20050218162729.GA5839@thunk.org> <4075.10.10.10.24.1108751663.squirrel@linux1> <20050218214555.1f71c2e4.aradorlinux@yahoo.es> <20050218131326.650c77ad.davem@davemloft.net> <20050218221819.GA3864@ucw.cz> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1288 Lines: 33 On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 23:18:19 +0100, Vojtech Pavlik wrote: > On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 09:34:47PM +0000, Anton Altaparmakov wrote: > > On Fri, 18 Feb 2005, David S. Miller wrote: > > > On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 21:45:55 +0100 > > > "d.c" wrote: > > > > > > > 2) And more important, *nobody* works against "linus' bk head". > > > > > > I do, %100 exclusively, for all the networking and sparc > > > development. > > > > > > I never work against the -mm tree. > > > > Dito. All my kernel development happens against Linus' bk head and I > > almost never work against -mm tree. > > Same here, I work on Linus's bk head and all the changes go to -mm for > testing first, then to Linus for inclusion. > I guess there is a perception that developers/maintainers are working against -mm because all maintainers trees are automatically pulled by Andrew. And when someone doing stuff on somewhat regular basis he/she tends to do it against maintainer's tree thus making patches suitable for -mm as well. -- Dmitry - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/