Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261549AbVBRXLy (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Feb 2005 18:11:54 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261551AbVBRXLy (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Feb 2005 18:11:54 -0500 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:49047 "EHLO parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261549AbVBRXLw (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Feb 2005 18:11:52 -0500 Message-ID: <42167615.5080906@pobox.com> Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 18:11:17 -0500 From: Jeff Garzik User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040922 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joerg Sommrey CC: "Martin J. Bligh" , Linux kernel mailing list Subject: Re: Question on CONFIG_IRQBALANCE / 2.6.x References: <20050218213332.GA13485@sommrey.de> <4440000.1108766389@flay> <20050218225722.GA11292@sommrey.de> In-Reply-To: <20050218225722.GA11292@sommrey.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1330 Lines: 33 Joerg Sommrey wrote: > On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 02:39:49PM -0800, Martin J. Bligh wrote: > >>>there's something I don't understand: With IRQBALANCE *enabled* almost >>>all interrupts are processed on CPU0. This changed in an unexpected way >>>after disabling IRQBALANCE: now all interrupts are distributed uniformly >>>to both CPUs. Maybe it's intentional, but it's not what I expect when a >>>config option named IRQBALANCE is *disabled*. >>> >>>Can anybody comment on this? >> >>If you have a Pentium 3 based system, by default they'll round robin. >>If you turn on IRQbalance, they won't move until the traffic gets high >>enough load to matter. That's presumably what you're seeing. > > > It's an Athlon box that propably has the same behaviour. Just another > question on this topic: with IRQBALANCE enabled, almost all interupts > are routet to CPU0. Lately irq 0 runs on CPU1 and never returns to CPU0 > - is there any obvious reason for that? Note that it is a popular recommendation to -disable- CONFIG_IRQBALANCE, and then run the userspace 'irqbalanced'. Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/