Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261642AbVBSG3v (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Feb 2005 01:29:51 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261643AbVBSG3u (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Feb 2005 01:29:50 -0500 Received: from 206.175.9.210.velocitynet.com.au ([210.9.175.206]:57267 "EHLO cunningham.myip.net.au") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261642AbVBSG3s (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Feb 2005 01:29:48 -0500 Subject: Should kirqd work on HT? From: Nigel Cunningham Reply-To: ncunningham@cyclades.com To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1108794699.4098.28.camel@desktop.cunningham.myip.net.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6-1mdk Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 17:31:39 +1100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1360 Lines: 39 Hi all. I've noticed this problem for a while, but only now decided to ask. Interrupt balancing doesn't do anything on my system. CPU0 CPU1 0: 31931808 0 IO-APIC-edge timer 1: 76595 0 IO-APIC-edge i8042 8: 1 0 IO-APIC-edge rtc 9: 1 0 IO-APIC-level acpi 14: 122 1 IO-APIC-edge ide0 16: 4074456 0 IO-APIC-level uhci_hcd, uhci_hcd, radeon@PCI:1:0:0 17: 4295132 0 IO-APIC-level Intel ICH5 18: 2070933 0 IO-APIC-level libata, uhci_hcd, eth0 19: 887311 0 IO-APIC-level uhci_hcd 22: 572530 0 IO-APIC-level ath0 NMI: 31931749 31931636 (I've since disabled the nmi_watchdog) LOC: 31931252 31931251 ERR: 0 MIS: 0 I enabled the debugging and found that it doesn't think it's worth the effort. Is that correct? Not a complaint, just curious! Regards, Nigel -- Nigel Cunningham Software Engineer, Canberra, Australia http://www.cyclades.com Ph: +61 (2) 6292 8028 Mob: +61 (417) 100 574 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/