Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 6 Jul 2001 17:29:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 6 Jul 2001 17:29:02 -0400 Received: from perninha.conectiva.com.br ([200.250.58.156]:54791 "HELO perninha.conectiva.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Fri, 6 Jul 2001 17:28:53 -0400 Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2001 18:28:47 -0300 (BRST) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: To: Eric Anderson Cc: Alan Cox , Subject: Re: BIGMEM kernel question In-Reply-To: <3B462AA8.F7F0089D@centtech.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 6 Jul 2001, Eric Anderson wrote: > Ahh. That makes sense. So how can I change the chunk size from > 64k to something higher (I assume I could set it to 128k to > effectively double that 3GB to 6GB)? That won't work. The address space limitation is a HARDWARE limitation. What you _can_ do is put data in shared memory segments, which you map and unmap on demand. Moving memory management to user space is the only way to (more or less) get around the 4GB hardware limitation. regards, Rik -- Executive summary of a recent Microsoft press release: "we are concerned about the GNU General Public License (GPL)" http://www.surriel.com/ http://www.conectiva.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/