Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262016AbVBUQPZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Feb 2005 11:15:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262021AbVBUQPZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Feb 2005 11:15:25 -0500 Received: from mail.nuim.ie ([149.157.1.19]:17387 "EHLO LARCH.MAY.IE") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262016AbVBUQPR (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Feb 2005 11:15:17 -0500 Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 16:15:16 +0000 From: Yee-Ting Li Subject: Re: BicTCP Implementation Bug In-reply-to: <421A0337.6020601@osdl.org> To: Stephen Hemminger Cc: Douglas Leith , linux-net@vger.kernel.org, rhee@ncsu.edu, Yee-Ting Li , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Baruch Even , Les Cottrell , Richard Hughes-Jones , davem@davemloft.net Message-id: <0d8ea68bba9feb62ffd08d085b47e48c@may.ie> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619.2) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT References: <421A0337.6020601@osdl.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1323 Lines: 32 We just wanted to be sure of the implementation against the official BicTCP versions and that it was a real bug. We are particularly concerned that the deployment of these experimental protocols (and they're not even RFCs) are too premature and that we think that they should be switched OFF by default to prevent undesirable consequences to network stability. One concern is that such protocols will steal (sometimes a lot of) bandwidth from normal network traffic. We wrote the paper as we (amongst others) are in the process of rigourously validating and testing these TCP proposals over a wide range of network environments There are also numerous other proposals around (HSTCP, ScalableTCP, HTCP, FAST etc) that we are also testing and we would be more than happy to provide patches (excluding FAST) and experimental results as they become available. Yee. On Feb 21, 2005, at 15:50, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > Yes, this looks like a bug, let me verify it first. > Why did you sit on this so long and go to all the trouble of making a > paper out of it? > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/