Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262050AbVBURSN (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Feb 2005 12:18:13 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262047AbVBURRU (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Feb 2005 12:17:20 -0500 Received: from vms044pub.verizon.net ([206.46.252.44]:19347 "EHLO vms044pub.verizon.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262045AbVBURQi (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Feb 2005 12:16:38 -0500 Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 12:16:35 -0500 From: Gene Heskett Subject: OT: Why is usb data many times the cpu hog that firewire is? To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Reply-to: gene.heskett@verizon.net Message-id: <200502211216.35194.gene.heskett@verizon.net> Organization: None, usuallly detectable by casual observers MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Content-disposition: inline User-Agent: KMail/1.7 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1015 Lines: 26 Greetings; Motherboard is a biostar with nforce2 chipset, 2800xp cpu, gig of ram. I've recently made the observation that while I can view 30fps video from my firewire equipt movie camera with a minimal cpu hit of 2-3%, but viewing the video from a webcam on a usb 1.1 circuit takes 30-40% of the cpu, at half the frame rate. Do I have something fubar in the usb? Or is this just the nature of the beast? -- Cheers, Gene "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) 99.34% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly Yahoo.com attorneys please note, additions to this message by Gene Heskett are: Copyright 2005 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/