Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262057AbVBUR6r (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Feb 2005 12:58:47 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262056AbVBUR6r (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Feb 2005 12:58:47 -0500 Received: from mail1.kontent.de ([81.88.34.36]:37785 "EHLO Mail1.KONTENT.De") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262057AbVBUR6h (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Feb 2005 12:58:37 -0500 From: Oliver Neukum To: gene.heskett@verizon.net Subject: Re: OT: Why is usb data many times the cpu hog that firewire is? Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 18:58:34 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200502211216.35194.gene.heskett@verizon.net> In-Reply-To: <200502211216.35194.gene.heskett@verizon.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200502211858.34301.oliver@neukum.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 854 Lines: 23 Am Montag, 21. Februar 2005 18:16 schrieb Gene Heskett: > Greetings; > > Motherboard is a biostar with nforce2 chipset, 2800xp cpu, gig of ram. > > I've recently made the observation that while I can view 30fps video > from my firewire equipt movie camera with a minimal cpu hit of 2-3%, > but viewing the video from a webcam on a usb 1.1 circuit takes 30-40% > of the cpu, at half the frame rate. > > Do I have something fubar in the usb? Or is this just the nature of > the beast? A video stream over usb1.1 must be compressed due to bandwidth available. Decompression needs cpu. Regards Oliver - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/