Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262067AbVBUS0Y (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Feb 2005 13:26:24 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262068AbVBUS0X (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Feb 2005 13:26:23 -0500 Received: from vms046pub.verizon.net ([206.46.252.46]:45813 "EHLO vms046pub.verizon.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262067AbVBUS0G (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Feb 2005 13:26:06 -0500 Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 13:25:54 -0500 From: Gene Heskett Subject: Re: OT: Why is usb data many times the cpu hog that firewire is? In-reply-to: <200502211858.34301.oliver@neukum.org> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Reply-to: gene.heskett@verizon.net Message-id: <200502211325.55013.gene.heskett@verizon.net> Organization: None, usuallly detectable by casual observers MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Content-disposition: inline References: <200502211216.35194.gene.heskett@verizon.net> <200502211858.34301.oliver@neukum.org> User-Agent: KMail/1.7 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1704 Lines: 46 On Monday 21 February 2005 12:58, Oliver Neukum wrote: >Am Montag, 21. Februar 2005 18:16 schrieb Gene Heskett: >> Greetings; >> >> Motherboard is a biostar with nforce2 chipset, 2800xp cpu, gig of >> ram. >> >> I've recently made the observation that while I can view 30fps >> video from my firewire equipt movie camera with a minimal cpu hit >> of 2-3%, but viewing the video from a webcam on a usb 1.1 circuit >> takes 30-40% of the cpu, at half the frame rate. >> >> Do I have something fubar in the usb? Or is this just the nature >> of the beast? > >A video stream over usb1.1 must be compressed due to bandwidth > available. Decompression needs cpu. > Thats what I was afraid of, which makes using it for a motion detected burgular alarm source considerably less than practical since the machine must be able to do other things too. Darn. And its usb1.1 even when plugged into a 2.0 capable port. One could probably use the FIR output of an EagleEye (X10 stuff) to start & stop a capture, but the lag inherent in that is less than 'optimum' IMO. Thank you Oliver. > Regards > Oliver -- Cheers, Gene "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) 99.34% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly Yahoo.com attorneys please note, additions to this message by Gene Heskett are: Copyright 2005 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/