From: Oliver Neukum <oliver@neukum.org>
To: gene.heskett@verizon.net
Subject: Re: OT: Why is usb data many times the cpu hog that firewire is?
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 19:46:02 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1
References: <200502211216.35194.gene.heskett@verizon.net> <200502211858.34301.oliver@neukum.org> <200502211325.55013.gene.heskett@verizon.net>
In-Reply-To: <200502211325.55013.gene.heskett@verizon.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-2"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200502211946.02233.oliver@neukum.org>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 748
Lines: 17

Am Montag, 21. Februar 2005 19:25 schrieb Gene Heskett:
> Thats what I was afraid of, which makes using it for a motion detected 
> burgular alarm source considerably less than practical since the 
> machine must be able to do other things too. ?Darn. ?And its usb1.1 
> even when plugged into a 2.0 capable port.

There are some cameras which can operate without compression at lowered
resolution and framerate. Maybe that is good enough. In addition,
decompression may be optimised.

	Regards
		Oliver
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/