Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org-S262189AbVBVBEW@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S262189AbVBVBEW (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Mon, 21 Feb 2005 20:04:22 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262190AbVBVBEW
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Mon, 21 Feb 2005 20:04:22 -0500
Received: from smtp-send.myrealbox.com ([192.108.102.143]:34270 "EHLO
	smtp-send.myrealbox.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S262189AbVBVBET (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 21 Feb 2005 20:04:19 -0500
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 17:04:04 -0800 (PST)
From: walt <wa1ter@myrealbox.com>
To: David Roundy <droundy@abridgegame.org>
cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [darcs-users] Re: [BK] upgrade will be needed
In-Reply-To: <fa.i74fd0g.1j44204@ifi.uio.no>
Message-ID: <20050221165051.A74231@x9.ybpnyarg>
References: <fa.g6qsmpt.131ka8d@ifi.uio.no> <fa.i74fd0g.1j44204@ifi.uio.no>
Organization: none
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 695
Lines: 25



On Mon, 21 Feb 2005, David Roundy wrote:

<snip very technical discussion>

I just scanned the comparison of various source-code management
schemes at

http://zooko.com/revision_control_quick_ref.html

and found myself wishing for a similar review of bk (which was
excluded, not being open-source).

Would you (or anyone else) be willing to compose a similar
evaluation of bk so we amateurs can get a feeling for how
these systems differ?

Thanks!

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/