Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261165AbVBVRwa (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Feb 2005 12:52:30 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261197AbVBVRwa (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Feb 2005 12:52:30 -0500 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:40119 "EHLO parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261165AbVBVRw0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Feb 2005 12:52:26 -0500 Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 17:52:25 +0000 From: Matthew Wilcox To: Jes Sorensen Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch -mm series] ia64 specific /dev/mem handlers Message-ID: <20050222175225.GK28741@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> References: <16923.193.128608.607599@jaguar.mkp.net> <20050222020309.4289504c.akpm@osdl.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 930 Lines: 21 On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 09:41:04AM -0500, Jes Sorensen wrote: > >> + if (page->flags & PG_uncached) > > Andrew> dude. That ain't gonna work ;) > > Pardon my lack of clue, but why not? I think you're supposed to always use test_bit() to check page flags -- "Next the statesmen will invent cheap lies, putting the blame upon the nation that is attacked, and every man will be glad of those conscience-soothing falsities, and will diligently study them, and refuse to examine any refutations of them; and thus he will by and by convince himself that the war is just, and will thank God for the better sleep he enjoys after this process of grotesque self-deception." -- Mark Twain - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/