Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261569AbVBWUxz (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Feb 2005 15:53:55 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261571AbVBWUxz (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Feb 2005 15:53:55 -0500 Received: from bay-bridge.veritas.com ([143.127.3.10]:22612 "EHLO MTVMIME01.enterprise.veritas.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261569AbVBWUxw (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Feb 2005 15:53:52 -0500 Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 20:53:13 +0000 (GMT) From: Hugh Dickins X-X-Sender: hugh@goblin.wat.veritas.com To: Lee Revell cc: Ingo Molnar , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel Subject: Re: More latency regressions with 2.6.11-rc4-RT-V0.7.39-02 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <1109182061.16201.6.camel@krustophenia.net> <1109187381.3174.5.camel@krustophenia.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 439 Lines: 11 On Wed, 23 Feb 2005, Hugh Dickins wrote: > Please replace by new patch below, which I'm now running through lmbench. That second patch seems fine, and I see no lmbench regression from it. Hugh - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/