Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261964AbVBXI1E (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Feb 2005 03:27:04 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261971AbVBXI1E (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Feb 2005 03:27:04 -0500 Received: from bay-bridge.veritas.com ([143.127.3.10]:15067 "EHLO MTVMIME01.enterprise.veritas.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261964AbVBXI1B (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Feb 2005 03:27:01 -0500 Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 08:26:11 +0000 (GMT) From: Hugh Dickins X-X-Sender: hugh@goblin.wat.veritas.com To: Lee Revell cc: Ingo Molnar , Nick Piggin , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel Subject: Re: More latency regressions with 2.6.11-rc4-RT-V0.7.39-02 In-Reply-To: <1109226724.4957.16.camel@krustophenia.net> Message-ID: References: <1109182061.16201.6.camel@krustophenia.net> <1109187381.3174.5.camel@krustophenia.net> <1109196824.4009.1.camel@krustophenia.net> <1109226724.4957.16.camel@krustophenia.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 787 Lines: 19 On Thu, 24 Feb 2005, Lee Revell wrote: > On Thu, 2005-02-24 at 04:56 +0000, Hugh Dickins wrote: > > > > In other mail, you do expect people still to be using Ingo's patches, > > so probably this patch should stick there (and in -mm) for now. > > Well all of these were fixed in the past so it may not be unreasonable > to fix them for 2.6.11. If we'd got to it earlier, yes. But 2.6.11 looks to be just a day or two away, and we've no idea why zap_pte_range or clear_page_range would have reverted. Nor have we heard from Ingo yet. Hugh - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/