Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262236AbVBXLxX (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Feb 2005 06:53:23 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262265AbVBXLxX (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Feb 2005 06:53:23 -0500 Received: from fire.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:37808 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262236AbVBXLxV (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Feb 2005 06:53:21 -0500 Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 03:52:55 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Mauricio Lin Cc: hugh@veritas.com, wli@holomorphy.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rrebel@whenu.com, marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com, nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au Subject: Re: [PATCH] A new entry for /proc Message-Id: <20050224035255.6b5b5412.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <3f250c710502240343563c5cb0@mail.gmail.com> References: <20050106202339.4f9ba479.akpm@osdl.org> <3f250c710502220513179b606a@mail.gmail.com> <3f250c71050224003110e74704@mail.gmail.com> <20050224010947.774628f3.akpm@osdl.org> <3f250c710502240343563c5cb0@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 541 Lines: 16 Mauricio Lin wrote: > > But can i use jiffies to measure this kind of performance??? AFAIK, if > it is more efficient, then it is faster, right? How can I know how > fast it is? Any idea? umm, time ( for i in $(seq 100); do; cat /proc/nnn/smaps; done > /dev/null ) ? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/