Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262668AbVBYKuL (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Feb 2005 05:50:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262670AbVBYKuK (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Feb 2005 05:50:10 -0500 Received: from e34.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.132]:10627 "EHLO e34.co.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262668AbVBYKuF (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Feb 2005 05:50:05 -0500 Message-Id: <200502251050.j1PAo6QK008040@owlet.beaverton.ibm.com> To: Nick Piggin cc: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/13] rework schedstats In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 24 Feb 2005 18:18:10 +1100." <1109229491.5177.71.camel@npiggin-nld.site> Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 02:50:06 -0800 From: Rick Lindsley Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 865 Lines: 22 I have an updated userspace parser for this thing, if you are still keeping it on your website. Sure, be happy to include it, thanks! Send it along. Is it for version 11 or version 12? Move balancing fields into struct sched_domain, so we can get more useful results on systems with multiple domains (eg SMT+SMP, CMP+NUMA, SMP+NUMA, etc). It looks like you've also removed the stats for pull_task() and wake_up_new_task(). Was this intentional, or accidental? I can't quite get the patch to apply cleanly against several variants of 2.6.10 or 2.6.11-rc*. Which version is the patch for? Rick - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/