Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262732AbVBYPnk (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Feb 2005 10:43:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262727AbVBYPnk (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Feb 2005 10:43:40 -0500 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.186]:50636 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262732AbVBYPmk (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Feb 2005 10:42:40 -0500 From: Christian Borntraeger To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Invalid module format in Fedora core2 Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 16:42:18 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 Cc: Payasam Manohar References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200502251642.19276.linux-kernel@borntraeger.net> X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de login:5a8b66f42810086ecd21595c2d6103b9 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 860 Lines: 25 Payasam Manohar wrote: > Hai all, > I tried to insert a sample module into Fedora core 2 , But it is > giving an error message that " no module in the object" > The same module was inserted successfully into Redhat linux 9. > > Is there any changes from RH 9 to Fedora Core 2 with respect to the > module writing and insertion. > > Any small help also welcome. Well, the most important difference is probably the move from Linux kernel 2.4 to Linux kernel 2.6. See http://lwn.net/Articles/driver-porting/ for details how to change modules from 2.4 to 2.6 (If source code is available). cheers Christian - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/