Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 7 Jul 2001 13:15:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 7 Jul 2001 13:15:15 -0400 Received: from fenrus.demon.co.uk ([158.152.228.152]:16597 "EHLO amadeus.home.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 7 Jul 2001 13:15:05 -0400 Message-Id: Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2001 18:15:00 +0100 (BST) From: arjan@fenrus.demon.nl To: jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com (Jeff Garzik) Subject: Re: RFC: Remove swap file support cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <3B472C06.78A9530C@mandrakesoft.com> X-Newsgroups: fenrus.linux.kernel User-Agent: tin/1.5.8-20010221 ("Blue Water") (UNIX) (Linux/2.4.3-6.0.1 (i586)) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In article <3B472C06.78A9530C@mandrakesoft.com> you wrote: > Since you can make any file into a block device using loop, > is there any value to supporting swap files in 2.5? > swap files seem like a special case that is no longer necessary... loop is always tricky re near-OOM deadlocks. It'll survive now, by sleeping and waiting for memory, but swapping over that changes that equation..... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/