Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262739AbVBYQr2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Feb 2005 11:47:28 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262740AbVBYQr2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Feb 2005 11:47:28 -0500 Received: from mustang.oldcity.dca.net ([216.158.38.3]:6791 "HELO mustang.oldcity.dca.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S262739AbVBYQrZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Feb 2005 11:47:25 -0500 Subject: Re: linux-2.6.8.1 to linux-2.6.10: Kernel Patching Issues. From: Lee Revell To: Mark Fortescue Cc: davem@davemloft.net, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, pekkas@netcore.fi, jmorris@redhat.com, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, kaber@coreworks.de, netdev@oss.sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 11:47:23 -0500 Message-Id: <1109350044.9681.26.camel@krustophenia.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 660 Lines: 19 On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 16:40 +0000, Mark Fortescue wrote: > Hi all, > > I am not sure exactly where to send this email. A have chosen the > ip4/ip6 networking as the issues are in this area of the kernel. > > The kernel patch files patch-2.6.9 and patch-2.6.10 do not apear to be > correct. No, you're doing it wrong. 2.6.8.1 was a bugfix release. The correct patching order is 2.6.8 -> 2.6.9 -> 2.6.10. Lee - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/