Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262748AbVBYQ46 (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Feb 2005 11:56:58 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262747AbVBYQ44 (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Feb 2005 11:56:56 -0500 Received: from pollux.ds.pg.gda.pl ([153.19.208.7]:36879 "EHLO pollux.ds.pg.gda.pl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262748AbVBYQzf (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Feb 2005 11:55:35 -0500 Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 17:55:50 +0100 From: Tomasz Torcz To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: linux-2.6.8.1 to linux-2.6.10: Kernel Patching Issues. Message-ID: <20050225165550.GA766@irc.pl> Mail-Followup-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <1109350044.9681.26.camel@krustophenia.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1109350044.9681.26.camel@krustophenia.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 844 Lines: 23 On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 11:47:23AM -0500, Lee Revell wrote: > On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 16:40 +0000, Mark Fortescue wrote: > > The kernel patch files patch-2.6.9 and patch-2.6.10 do not apear to be > > correct. > > No, you're doing it wrong. 2.6.8.1 was a bugfix release. The correct > patching order is 2.6.8 -> 2.6.9 -> 2.6.10. Hi did patch from 2.6.8: #v+ 3) bzcat ../patch-2.6.8.1.bz2 | patch -R -p1 This gives a 2.6.8 kernel. #v- -- Tomasz Torcz "Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station zdzichu@irc.-nie.spam-.pl wagon filled with backup tapes." -- Jim Gray - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/