Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261177AbVBZCny (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Feb 2005 21:43:54 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261178AbVBZCny (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Feb 2005 21:43:54 -0500 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:49024 "EHLO parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261177AbVBZCnv (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Feb 2005 21:43:51 -0500 Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 19:26:08 -0300 From: Marcelo Tosatti To: Schwarz Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.4.29: Zombies not detected or removed Message-ID: <20050225222608.GB15251@logos.cnet> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1797 Lines: 54 On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 12:32:33PM +0100, Schwarz wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > since 2.4.29 we discovered a strange behaviour. > > Severall tasks are no longer detected as destroyed. > means, these tasks have ended but arn't removed from > the processlist. > > An example from today: > > [root@d102 ]# date > Mon Feb 21 10:14:06 CET 2005 > [root@d102 ]# strace -p 33326 > attach: ptrace(PTRACE_ATTACH, ...): No such process > [root@d102 ]# ps aux | grep 29579 > 33326 29579 0.0 0.2 10696 4332 ? SN 10:11 0:00 -f > /home/ajondoco > root 19168 0.0 0.0 1768 628 pts/0 S 10:15 0:00 grep 29579 > [root@d102 ]# strace -p 33326 > attach: ptrace(PTRACE_ATTACH, ...): No such process > [root@d102 ]# > > As you can see the process in question "29579" was started > 10:11 , but as finished its activity already. After 10 > minutes it's still not removed from the processlist and > it's not detected as a zombie. > > the task was an Apache 1.3.3 child over a wrapper calling php > with -f option. > > We think it's unimportant if its forked or execev(),because on > another maschine it was not even an apache invoked. > > Some of the these processes enter zombie state, but were never > fully removed ! > > Any ideas why it and what happens? I don't, no. Quite strange. Can you reproduce this? If sys_ptrace() failed the process is not present. Can you please "cat /proc//status" when ptrace fails but the ps shows the process existance ? I suppose you haven't been seeing this behaviour with v2.4.28 ? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/