Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261237AbVBZRUn (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Feb 2005 12:20:43 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261239AbVBZRUm (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Feb 2005 12:20:42 -0500 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([212.18.232.186]:14092 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261237AbVBZRUZ (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Feb 2005 12:20:25 -0500 Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 17:20:18 +0000 From: Russell King To: Adrian Bunk Cc: Greg KH , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] deprecate EXPORT_SYMBOL(do_settimeofday) Message-ID: <20050226172018.A15124@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Adrian Bunk , Greg KH , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20050224233742.GR8651@stusta.de> <20050224212448.367af4be.akpm@osdl.org> <20050226133337.GK3311@stusta.de> <20050226144635.B7151@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20050226162341.GN3311@stusta.de> <20050226164613.E7151@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20050226171325.GO3311@stusta.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20050226171325.GO3311@stusta.de>; from bunk@stusta.de on Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 06:13:25PM +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1559 Lines: 34 On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 06:13:25PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > You call it "breakage" because you have a relatively dogmatic view > regarding the selection of user visible symbols. > Other people care more about the usability of the kernel config system, > and therefore a select of one of the I2C* options is quite common from > both outside and inside the i2c subsystem. > > There are two possbile situations: > - these RTC drivers are nice add-ons that could be shown if all > required I2C* options are already enabled > - these RTC drivers are pretty essential and should really be enabled > on the platforms they are for > > Which of these two cases describes the situation of these RTC drivers? Since RTCs aren't _actually_ essential for Linux kernel operation, the former clearly applies. Other people may have differing opinions, but having worked with a large number of SoC platforms where the RTC is reset when the SoC is reset, or even platforms where there is no RTC at all, it brings a different perspective to this that people who have only ever experienced systems where the RTC is always true do not have. -- Russell King Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of: 2.6 PCMCIA - http://pcmcia.arm.linux.org.uk/ 2.6 Serial core - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/