Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261249AbVBZVuk (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Feb 2005 16:50:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261267AbVBZVuk (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Feb 2005 16:50:40 -0500 Received: from hera.cwi.nl ([192.16.191.8]:61355 "EHLO hera.cwi.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261249AbVBZVuh (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Feb 2005 16:50:37 -0500 Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 22:50:36 +0100 (MET) From: Message-Id: <200502262150.j1QLoaH25198@apps.cwi.nl> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: cyrix_arr_init and centaur_mcr_init unused? Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 698 Lines: 18 arch/i386/kernel/cpu/mtrr/cyrix.c has a routine cyrix_arr_init(), and arch/i386/kernel/cpu/mtrr/centaur.c has a routine centaur_mcr_init(). At first sight it looks like these are unused. Do I overlook something? (They occur as the .init fields of some struct, and I did not find any calls of ->init().) If there are no calls and the code is needed, then some systems may be broken today. If the code is not needed, maybe it should be removed. Andries - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/