Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261314AbVB0A21 (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Feb 2005 19:28:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261315AbVB0A21 (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Feb 2005 19:28:27 -0500 Received: from emailhub.stusta.mhn.de ([141.84.69.5]:45061 "HELO mailout.stusta.mhn.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S261314AbVB0A2W (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Feb 2005 19:28:22 -0500 Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 01:28:14 +0100 From: Adrian Bunk To: Greg KH , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] deprecate EXPORT_SYMBOL(do_settimeofday) Message-ID: <20050227002814.GP3311@stusta.de> References: <20050224233742.GR8651@stusta.de> <20050224212448.367af4be.akpm@osdl.org> <20050226133337.GK3311@stusta.de> <20050226144635.B7151@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20050226162341.GN3311@stusta.de> <20050226164613.E7151@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20050226171325.GO3311@stusta.de> <20050226172018.A15124@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050226172018.A15124@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1800 Lines: 44 On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 05:20:18PM +0000, Russell King wrote: > On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 06:13:25PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > You call it "breakage" because you have a relatively dogmatic view > > regarding the selection of user visible symbols. > > Other people care more about the usability of the kernel config system, > > and therefore a select of one of the I2C* options is quite common from > > both outside and inside the i2c subsystem. > > > > There are two possbile situations: > > - these RTC drivers are nice add-ons that could be shown if all > > required I2C* options are already enabled > > - these RTC drivers are pretty essential and should really be enabled > > on the platforms they are for > > > > Which of these two cases describes the situation of these RTC drivers? > > Since RTCs aren't _actually_ essential for Linux kernel operation, > the former clearly applies. > > Other people may have differing opinions, but having worked with a > large number of SoC platforms where the RTC is reset when the SoC > is reset, or even platforms where there is no RTC at all, it brings > a different perspective to this that people who have only ever > experienced systems where the RTC is always true do not have. No problem with this. I'm hereby withdrawing my patch. cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/