Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 7 Jul 2001 17:43:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 7 Jul 2001 17:43:18 -0400 Received: from router-100M.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.17]:44812 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 7 Jul 2001 17:43:12 -0400 Subject: Re: VM in 2.4.7-pre hurts... To: riel@conectiva.com.br (Rik van Riel) Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2001 22:43:06 +0100 (BST) Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox), torvalds@transmeta.com (Linus Torvalds), jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com (Jeff Garzik), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (Linux Kernel Mailing List), phillips@bonn-fries.net (Daniel Phillips) In-Reply-To: from "Rik van Riel" at Jul 07, 2001 06:29:30 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > Its certainly misleading. I got Jeff to try making oom return > > 4999 out of 5000 times regardless. > > In that case, he _is_ OOM. ;) Hardly > 1) (almost) no free memory > 2) no free swap > 3) very little pagecache + buffer cache Large amounts of cache, which went away when the OOM code was neutered - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/