Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261514AbVB1C4R (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Feb 2005 21:56:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261538AbVB1C4R (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Feb 2005 21:56:17 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:44193 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261514AbVB1C4O (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Feb 2005 21:56:14 -0500 Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 21:56:09 -0500 (EST) From: James Morris X-X-Sender: jmorris@thoron.boston.redhat.com To: Shawn Starr cc: LKML Subject: Re: SELinux and sysfs In-Reply-To: <200502270021.24252.shawn.starr@rogers.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 689 Lines: 24 On Sun, 27 Feb 2005, Shawn Starr wrote: > Perhaps in future, maybe SELinux could take advantage of sysfs to modify some > policies? Is this doable? > Sure, we still need some flat files for static configurations, but what about > dynamic ones? This is already possible via the 'booleans' directory under the selinuxfs root. See http://www.tresys.com/Downloads/selinux-tools/README-COND.txt - James -- James Morris - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/