Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 7 Jul 2001 22:58:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 7 Jul 2001 22:57:58 -0400 Received: from ppp0.ocs.com.au ([203.34.97.3]:19205 "HELO mail.ocs.com.au") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sat, 7 Jul 2001 22:57:52 -0400 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 From: Keith Owens To: Jamie Lokier cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Acpi] Re: ACPI fundamental locking problems In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 08 Jul 2001 00:14:24 +0200." <20010708001424.B10370@pcep-jamie.cern.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2001 12:57:46 +1000 Message-ID: <21945.994561066@ocs3.ocs-net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 8 Jul 2001 00:14:24 +0200, Jamie Lokier wrote: >On this theme, it's just occured to me that the module loader could be >taught to map ramfs pages directly to module code/data space. That >would save a little memory. I doubt it. insmod relocates the code and data sections, discards sections, inserts a struct module, hooks the module into the existing change and generally mangles the object before it can be used by the kernel. Any change to a page prevents it being mapped against cramfs. If you had a complete page that was identical before and after insmod had done its work I would be astonished. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/