Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 15:47:23 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
       linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: swsusp logic error?
Message-ID: <20050228144723.GA3384@elf.ucw.cz>
References: <20050208203950.GA21623@cirrus.madduck.net> <20050227174309.GA27265@piper.madduck.net> <20050228135604.GA6364@piper.madduck.net> <200502281533.01621.rjw@sisk.pl> <20050228144506.GA11125@piper.madduck.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20050228144506.GA11125@piper.madduck.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 888
Lines: 23

Hi!

> also sprach Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> [2005.02.28.1533 +0100]:
> > Could you, please, verify that you don't need to load any modules
> > from initrd for your swap partition to work?  It won't work if you do.
> 
> this makes perfect sense to me when you talk about resuming. does it
> also apply to suspending?

As kernel is the same for suspend and resume... Yes, it seems it makes
sense.

Of course, it was a mistake, not design, but failed suspend is better
than failed resume.
								Pavel
-- 
People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers...
...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/