Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261202AbVCABWN (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Feb 2005 20:22:13 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261197AbVCABWM (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Feb 2005 20:22:12 -0500 Received: from shawidc-mo1.cg.shawcable.net ([24.71.223.10]:20333 "EHLO pd4mo1so.prod.shaw.ca") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261202AbVCABVS (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Feb 2005 20:21:18 -0500 Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 19:21:14 -0600 From: Robert Hancock Subject: Re: Complicated networking problem In-reply-to: <3CLkr-2LJ-7@gated-at.bofh.it> To: linux-kernel Message-id: <4223C38A.2040206@shaw.ca> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Accept-Language: en-us, en References: <3CLkr-2LJ-7@gated-at.bofh.it> User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1042 Lines: 24 Jarne Cook wrote: > Is there a way to allow an application which has bound to wlan0 > (192.168.0.202) and an application bound to eth0 (192.168.0.238) both have > access to the internet at the same time, and not require an application to > bind to a different local address? I'm not sure exactly what you want to have happen here.. if an application is making outbound connections it has to effectively use one interface or the other. If you want to switch between the two of them automatically, something like NetworkManager(http://people.redhat.com/dcbw/NetworkManager/) may work, however it's not going to be seamless (as in, preserving open connections), since the IP addresses are different.. -- Robert Hancock Saskatoon, SK, Canada Home Page: http://www.roberthancock.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/