Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261272AbVCAGm2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Mar 2005 01:42:28 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261262AbVCAGm1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Mar 2005 01:42:27 -0500 Received: from smtp.andrew.cmu.edu ([128.2.10.81]:39907 "EHLO smtp.andrew.cmu.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261263AbVCAGmB (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Mar 2005 01:42:01 -0500 Message-ID: <42240EB3.6040504@andrew.cmu.edu> Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 01:41:55 -0500 From: James Bruce User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050116) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gerd Knorr CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Potentially dead bttv cards from 2.6.10 References: <422001CD.7020806@andrew.cmu.edu> <20050228134410.GA7499@bytesex> <42232DFC.6090000@andrew.cmu.edu> <87mzto3c78.fsf@bytesex.org> In-Reply-To: <87mzto3c78.fsf@bytesex.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2007 Lines: 44 Thanks for the hints. Unfortunately the cards in question really are fairly generic and thus don't appear in the list. I tried the first 75 cards as insmod options (using a script of course), and some of them are different, but none work properly. I am lucky in that I still have a spare. If you could suggest a very well tested kernel for bttv (2.6.9?), I can set up another machine with that kernel and the remaining card. That should allow me to isolate the problem better. At the very least I could get the right card= option to use for the broken pair. Hopefully I will be able to generate a table entry for this card for bttv-cards.c; I'll look some more at this tomorrow. I've heard that there is some way to dump eeproms; Is there a way to write them also? If I could copy the eeprom from the unused cards to the (now broken) pair that might fix things. Thanks, Jim Gerd Knorr wrote: > James Bruce writes: > >>Well, are there any theories as to why it would work flawlessly, then >>after a hard lockup (due to what I think is a buggy V4L2 application), >>that the cards no longer work? > > No idea why the eeprom doesn't respond any more. Maybe it's really > broken. Note that the eeprom is read only at insmod time (and even > that for some cards only), thus there isn't a clear connection between > the crash and the eeprom issue. It could have died earlied unnoticed. > > The eeprom holds the PCI Subsystem ID, so without a working eeprom > bttv can't figure automatically what exact card that is (see the > "unknown/default" card name in the log) and maybe thats why does not > work any more for the card in question. Thats should be easily > fixable using the card= insmod option. > > Gerd - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/