Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261939AbVCAQIr (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Mar 2005 11:08:47 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261956AbVCAQIr (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Mar 2005 11:08:47 -0500 Received: from hirsch.in-berlin.de ([192.109.42.6]:24724 "EHLO hirsch.in-berlin.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261939AbVCAQIj (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Mar 2005 11:08:39 -0500 X-Envelope-From: kraxel@bytesex.org Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2005 17:03:27 +0100 From: Gerd Knorr To: James Bruce Cc: Paulo Marques , Bill Davidsen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Potentially dead bttv cards from 2.6.10 Message-ID: <20050301160327.GB4595@bytesex> References: <42232DFC.6090000@andrew.cmu.edu> <4223A5C3.6010000@tmr.com> <42241491.2060303@andrew.cmu.edu> <42247822.7030107@grupopie.com> <42248DE0.9090003@andrew.cmu.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42248DE0.9090003@andrew.cmu.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 637 Lines: 15 > I did notice one strange thing though; the card= option is only applied > to the first bttv card. All remaining cards in the system are still > autodetected (which ends up assuming card=0 in my case). Not sure if > this is the intended behavior or not, since someone really could run two > different bttv cards in the same system. Intentional. Try "insmd bttv card=3,4" ... Gerd - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/