Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262219AbVCBITG (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Mar 2005 03:19:06 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262220AbVCBITG (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Mar 2005 03:19:06 -0500 Received: from colin2.muc.de ([193.149.48.15]:31500 "HELO colin2.muc.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S262219AbVCBIS7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Mar 2005 03:18:59 -0500 Date: 2 Mar 2005 09:18:58 +0100 Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 09:18:58 +0100 From: Andi Kleen To: Andreas Schwab Cc: Bernd Schubert , Linux Kernel Mailing List , trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no Subject: Re: x86_64: 32bit emulation problems Message-ID: <20050302081858.GA7672@muc.de> References: <200502282154.08009.bernd.schubert@pci.uni-heidelberg.de> <200503012207.02915.bernd-schubert@web.de> <200503020019.20256.bernd-schubert@web.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 769 Lines: 22 On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 12:46:23AM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote: > Bernd Schubert writes: > > > Hmm, after compiling with -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 it works fine. But why does > > it work without this option on a 32bit kernel, but not on a 64bit kernel? > > See nfs_fileid_to_ino_t for why the inode number is different between > 32bit and 64bit kernels. Ok that explains it. Thanks. Best would be probably to just do the shift unconditionally on 64bit kernels too. Trond, what do you think? -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/