Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262337AbVCBQ0s (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Mar 2005 11:26:48 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262300AbVCBQ0s (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Mar 2005 11:26:48 -0500 Received: from mail0.lsil.com ([147.145.40.20]:37543 "EHLO mail0.lsil.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262337AbVCBQ0a (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Mar 2005 11:26:30 -0500 Message-ID: <0E3FA95632D6D047BA649F95DAB60E570230CBEC@exa-atlanta> From: "Bagalkote, Sreenivas" To: "'Marcelo Tosatti'" , "Andrey J. Melnikoff (TEMHOTA)" , Vasily Averin Cc: Matt Domsch , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Mukker, Atul" Subject: RE: v2.4 megaraid2 update Re: [PATCH] Prevent NMI oopser Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 11:26:06 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2181 Lines: 65 Hello Marcelo, As per our offline conversation, I have verified the update that went into 2.4.30-pre2. I confirm that all changes are correct. I have only one doubt: The driver was using sleep_on_timeout for lack of msleep. Should it start using msleep now? Vasily & Andrey, thank you for your efforts. Thanks, Sreenivas LSI LOGIC Corporation >-----Original Message----- >From: Marcelo Tosatti [mailto:marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com] >Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 2:06 AM >To: Andrey J. Melnikoff (TEMHOTA); Vasily Averin >Cc: Matt Domsch; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Mukker, Atul; >Bagalkote, Sreenivas >Subject: v2.4 megaraid2 update Re: [PATCH] Prevent NMI oopser > > >Hi, > >As the megaraid2 maintainers dont seem to care about v2.4 >mainline at all, completly >ignoring my requests to fix the NMI oopser bug for several >months, I'm applying the RHEL3 >update + inline reordering, which should do it. > >At this point I'm quite sure they wont answer this message either. :( > >Thanks Vasily and Andrey. > >On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 11:27:45PM +0300, Andrey J. Melnikoff >(TEMHOTA) wrote: >> Hi Matt, Marcelo! >> On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 02:19:14PM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote next: >> >> > On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 10:32:28PM +0300, Vasily Averin wrote: >> > > >As a hack, one could #define inline /*nothing*/ in >megaraid2.h to >> > > >avoid this, but it would be nice if the functions could all get >> > > >reordered such that inlining works properly, and the >need for function >> > > >declarations in megaraid2.h would disappear completely. >> > > >> > > >> > > Could you fix it by additional patch? Or you going to >prepare a new one? >> >> Any chance to include this two patches before 2.4.30 release? >> >> Vasily Averin patch: >> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=110737085714273&w=2 >> And my (incremental) patch: >> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=110738438005846&w=2 > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/