Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261298AbVCBXMR (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Mar 2005 18:12:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261320AbVCBXLV (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Mar 2005 18:11:21 -0500 Received: from mail.kroah.org ([69.55.234.183]:10726 "EHLO perch.kroah.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261298AbVCBXEX (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Mar 2005 18:04:23 -0500 Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 15:04:01 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: RFD: Kernel release numbering Message-ID: <20050302230400.GA9394@kroah.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1090 Lines: 29 /me kills my patchbomb script for now On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 02:21:38PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > - 2.6.: even at all levels, aim for having had minimally intrusive > patches leading up to it (timeframe: a week or two) > > with the odd numbers going like: > > - 2.6.: still a stable kernel, but accept bigger changes leading up > to it (timeframe: a month or two). Ok, that's acceptable to me, but realize that this puts a bigger burden on the maintainers to queue up patches for you. It's not that big of a deal, just something to be aware of. Speaking of which, does this mean I shouldn't hit you with all of my pending stuff? I know some of the other subsystem maintainers have a lot of stuff queued up too. Should we start this new numbering scheme as of today? Or wait until 2.6.13? thanks, greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/