Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261219AbVCBXnn (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Mar 2005 18:43:43 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261527AbVCBXjk (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Mar 2005 18:39:40 -0500 Received: from 70-56-134-246.albq.qwest.net ([70.56.134.246]:14246 "EHLO montezuma.fsmlabs.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261506AbVCBXhe (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Mar 2005 18:37:34 -0500 Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 16:38:47 -0700 (MST) From: Zwane Mwaikambo To: "Jeff V. Merkey" cc: Kernel Mailing List , Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: RFD: Kernel release numbering In-Reply-To: <422643F0.8050603@utah-nac.org> Message-ID: References: <422643F0.8050603@utah-nac.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 652 Lines: 14 On Wed, 2 Mar 2005, Jeff V. Merkey wrote: > __Stable__ would be a good thing. The entire 2.6 development has been a > disaster from a stability viewpoint. I have to maintain a huge tree of > patches in order to ship appliance builds due to the lack of stability > for 2.6. I think that the even number releases will take longer but it's > worth the wait. What form of instability are you referring to? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/