Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261300AbVCBXsc (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Mar 2005 18:48:32 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261407AbVCBXfs (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Mar 2005 18:35:48 -0500 Received: from c-67-177-11-57.client.comcast.net ([67.177.11.57]:2176 "EHLO vger") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261320AbVCBXbo (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Mar 2005 18:31:44 -0500 Message-ID: <42264C31.9070809@utah-nac.org> Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 16:28:49 -0700 From: "Jeff V. Merkey" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040510 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Randy.Dunlap" Cc: Kernel Mailing List , torvalds@osdl.org Subject: Re: RFD: Kernel release numbering References: <422643F0.8050603@utah-nac.org> <42264B91.9090505@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <42264B91.9090505@osdl.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 936 Lines: 33 Randy.Dunlap wrote: > Jeff V. Merkey wrote: > >> >> __Stable__ would be a good thing. The entire 2.6 development has been >> a disaster from >> a stability viewpoint. I have to maintain a huge tree of patches in >> order to ship appliance >> builds due to the lack of stability for 2.6. I think that the even >> number releases will take longer but it's worth the wait. >> >> Jeff > > > Linus's release cycle estimate might be optimistic. :) > Yep, but at least he is addressing the issue and taking responsibility and showing good prudent leadership and some reasonable and sound ideas to correct it. > I'm seeing lots more bug reports recently than I care to see. :( Yep. Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/