Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261396AbVCCERl (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Mar 2005 23:17:41 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261327AbVCCEPZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Mar 2005 23:15:25 -0500 Received: from pimout4-ext.prodigy.net ([207.115.63.98]:23019 "EHLO pimout4-ext.prodigy.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261342AbVCCEKb (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Mar 2005 23:10:31 -0500 Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 20:10:20 -0800 From: Chris Wedgwood To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: RFD: Kernel release numbering Message-ID: <20050303041020.GA28642@taniwha.stupidest.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1206 Lines: 33 On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 02:21:38PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > - 2.6.: even at all levels, aim for having had minimally intrusive > patches leading up to it (timeframe: a week or two) > > with the odd numbers going like: > > - 2.6.: still a stable kernel, but accept bigger changes leading up > to it (timeframe: a month or two). > - 2..x: aim for big changes that may destabilize the kernel for > several releases (timeframe: a year or two) [...] Why not change the "2.6 prefix" to 2.8, 3.0 (or whatever) if/when you do go to a new naming scheme --- simply to make a clean break between the new and the old. Plus it will give the suckdork crowd[1] bigger numbers to drivel on about. That said it would be a large numerical leap without and real feature changes so perhaps that will further add to confusion? Sigh. [1] Well, and the CGL and similar people. "New CGL with improved version numbers and fewer calories!" - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/