Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261468AbVCCFEe (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Mar 2005 00:04:34 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261480AbVCCEm7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Mar 2005 23:42:59 -0500 Received: from smtp817.mail.sc5.yahoo.com ([66.163.170.3]:6831 "HELO smtp817.mail.sc5.yahoo.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S261349AbVCCETy (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Mar 2005 23:19:54 -0500 From: Russell Miller To: Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: RFD: Kernel release numbering Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 20:21:00 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 Cc: Jeff Garzik , "David S. Miller" , akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <422674A4.9080209@pobox.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200503022021.00878.rmiller@duskglow.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2613 Lines: 61 On Wednesday 02 March 2005 19:37, Linus Torvalds wrote: > That's the whole point here, at least to me. I want to have people test > things out, but it doesn't matter how many -rc kernels I'd do, it just > won't happen. It's not a "real release". > > In contrast, making it a real release, and making it clear that it's a > release in its own right, might actually get people to use it. > > Might. Maybe. > Linus, I respect all of the work you have done on the Linux kernels over the years, and I have been an avid user of Linux almost since its inception (when I could get it to work with the hardware, at least in the early days ;-) And the fact that my contributions to the kernel are almost nonexistent probbly means you won't pay attention to a word I say anyway :-) that's alright, I'm going to say it and you can listen if you want. My respect for your accomplishments is why it pains me a great deal to have to tell you that I think you're wrong. I agree with the first part of your mail that I quoted above. Indeed, the -rc releases are not a "real release", and therefore people aren't going to test it. What you are missing is that if you use the method you have proposed. odd numberered kernels will stop being a "real release" as well to a great deal of users. I don't think you will actually gain anything here except for just changing the kernel naming scheme yet *again*. I certainly don't think you're going to solve the problem you are trying to solve. The problem as stated is that people are not downloading and testing the test releases. Your solution to that problem is to make test releases look like real releases and maybe people will test them anyway. The solution should be to find a way to encourage people to download and test the test releases. Perhaps a "bug bounty" of some kind (it doesn't have to be money), or something similar, may prove to be a better motivator than trying to trick the userbase. It's not going to work. If you take the motivational approach, then it won't matter what you name the test releases, people will test them anyway. Several ideas right off the top of my head: - a "bug bounty" as I mentioned above. - a volunteer army of people, similar to the "kernel janitors", whose job is to do QA for the kernel. --Russell -- Russell Miller - rmiller@duskglow.com - Agoura, CA - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/