Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261460AbVCCFb5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Mar 2005 00:31:57 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261509AbVCCFX5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Mar 2005 00:23:57 -0500 Received: from mail.autoweb.net ([198.172.237.26]:19984 "EHLO mail.autoweb.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261484AbVCCFUe (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Mar 2005 00:20:34 -0500 Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 00:20:21 -0500 From: Ryan Anderson To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Matthias Andree , Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.11 Message-ID: <20050303052021.GK7828@mythryan2.michonline.com> Mail-Followup-To: Linus Torvalds , Matthias Andree , Kernel Mailing List References: <20050302103158.GA13485@merlin.emma.line.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1028 Lines: 25 On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 07:46:05AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > (In contrast the full ChangeLog was missing because the generation script > I use is not exactly the smart way, so it's O(slow(n)), where slow is n**3 > or worse, so the log from the last -rc release is fast, but going back all > the way to 2.6.10 took long long enough that I didn't wait for it). Is there some reason why bk changes -aem -rv2.6.10..+ | shortlog isn't sufficient? I'd guess your script will want to calculate the 2.6.10 part automatically, but that seems to run in a second or so on my machine, from a largely cold cache. I *think* this gets all the changes where a -d (date) based method gets very confused by parallel trees. Am I missing something? -- Ryan Anderson sometimes Pug Majere - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/