Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261489AbVCCGSq (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Mar 2005 01:18:46 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261508AbVCCGQW (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Mar 2005 01:16:22 -0500 Received: from tanthi.teneoris.com ([164.164.94.19]:27539 "EHLO tanthi.teneoris.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261489AbVCCGJe (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Mar 2005 01:09:34 -0500 Subject: Initrd and Initramfs From: Amol To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1109830227.4063.60.camel@amol.teneoris.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 11:40:27 +0530 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 418 Lines: 14 Hi, For an embedded developers perspective, Is there any other advantage of using initramfs over initrd apart from RAMFS benefits over RAMDISK ? Please CC me Thanks Amol - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/