Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261543AbVCCG1D (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Mar 2005 01:27:03 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261482AbVCCGY1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Mar 2005 01:24:27 -0500 Received: from vms040pub.verizon.net ([206.46.252.40]:7887 "EHLO vms040pub.verizon.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261544AbVCCGVK (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Mar 2005 01:21:10 -0500 Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 01:21:08 -0500 From: Gene Heskett Subject: Re: [Fwd: United States Patent: 6,862,609] In-reply-to: <4226927A.6010107@utah-nac.org> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Reply-to: gene.heskett@verizon.net Message-id: <200503030121.08778.gene.heskett@verizon.net> Organization: None, usuallly detectable by casual observers MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Content-disposition: inline References: <4226781B.7080302@utah-nac.org> <200503022227.40614.gene.heskett@verizon.net> <4226927A.6010107@utah-nac.org> User-Agent: KMail/1.7 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2331 Lines: 57 On Wednesday 02 March 2005 23:28, Jeff V. Merkey wrote: >Gene Heskett wrote: >>On Wednesday 02 March 2005 21:36, Jeff V. Merkey wrote: >>>Another Linux patent..... >> >>And that pretty much says it. Assigned to the Canopy Group. So >> SCO will have yet another lawsuit to threaten us with. If they >> survive the thrashing I've Been Moved will give them at the end of >> the day. > >The way to fight the patents is for Linux developers to file their > own and start >putting down stakes. Play your game your way or get out of Dodge eh? I have opinions on that, but they aren't printable on a public list. But at least we ALL know now who you are STILL working for, don't we? If you were such a gung-ho FOSS fan, it should have been offered to the eff or fsf. It brings up another sore point with me. I'm of the opinion that both copyright, and patent, should be granted to the author/inventor on a non-transferable basis. He could then sell rights to use it for a set period of time, at the end of which it is still his. The present, sell it to the highest bidder situation too often leaves talented folks in the soup lines at the local mission because they were screwed out of the benefits their invention or composition should have brought them. >> Why the hell would I want >> to look at the link in kwrite? > >Talk to the USPTO, they created these links from their website. BTW, > if you check >the verson of web server run on the uspto.gov server, you will > discover it is >Apache on IBM servers and IBM Linux. Ask them why IBM's sofware > outputs links this way. Correction Jeff, you sent that link to the list, and IMNSHO, it was your job to see to it the mimetype was properly set. It was not. -- Cheers, Gene "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) 99.34% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly Yahoo.com attorneys please note, additions to this message by Gene Heskett are: Copyright 2005 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/