Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 7 Nov 2000 22:40:18 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 7 Nov 2000 22:40:08 -0500 Received: from [194.73.73.138] ([194.73.73.138]:1749 "EHLO ruthenium") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 7 Nov 2000 22:39:53 -0500 From: davej@suse.de Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2000 03:39:39 +0000 (GMT) To: "Jeff V. Merkey" cc: David Lang , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Installing kernel 2.4 In-Reply-To: <3A0899EC.BCF17E69@timpanogas.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 7 Nov 2000, Jeff V. Merkey wrote: > > remember it's not just the start of the file that varies based on cachline > > size, it's the positioning of code and data thoughout the kernel image. > Understood. I will go off and give some thought and study and respond > later after I have a proposal on the best way to do this. In NetWare, > we had indirections in the code all over the place. NT just make huge > and fat programs (NTKRNLOS.DLL is absolutely huge). I'm glad you realise this. The Netware method you mention above sounds over complicated for the desired end result, and the NT method just sounds like a gross hack. The current 'compile for the arch you intend to run on' is right now, the simplest, cleanest way to do this. If you manage to pull something off in MANOS or whatever other OS, to prove all this otherwise (without resorting to ugly hacks like the above), great for you, I (and I assume others) would like to hear about it. regards, Davej. -- | Dave Jones http://www.suse.de/~davej | SuSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/