Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261509AbVCCRmM (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Mar 2005 12:42:12 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261377AbVCCRlJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Mar 2005 12:41:09 -0500 Received: from orb.pobox.com ([207.8.226.5]:37353 "EHLO orb.pobox.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262584AbVCCRhk (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Mar 2005 12:37:40 -0500 Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 10:37:23 -0700 From: Paul Dickson To: Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: RFD: Kernel release numbering Message-Id: <20050303103723.11cfdd07.dickson@permanentmail.com> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.9.3 (GTK+ 2.4.14; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1689 Lines: 38 On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 14:21:38 -0800 (PST), Linus Torvalds wrote: > The reason I put a shorter timeframe on the "all-even" kernel is because I > don't want developers to be too itchy and sitting on stuff for too long if > they did something slightly bigger. In theory, the longer the better > there, but in practice this release numbering is still nothing but a hint > of the _intent_ of the developers - it's still not a guarantee of "we > fixed all bugs", and anybody who expects that (and tries to avoid all odd > release entirely) is just setting himself up for not testing - and thus > bugs. > > Comments? You still haven't solved the problem of only a small group using the development kernels. Until a "stable" kernel is released, the majority of kernel compilers will avoid any development kernel (even on this mailing list!). Two suggestions (one or both could be implemented): How about appointing maintainers for 2.6.N kernels, whose responsibility is apply stability and security patches for 3 months AND until 2.6.N+3 is released. So a series of 2.6.11.M kernels will appear until 2.6.14 and 2.6.11 is at least 3 months old. This would given kernel developers experience with such releases, but without the job being for the life of the developer. Also, add a list to the kernel.org web page about which kernels are considered stable. Listed stable kernels are those who have been released for at least two weeks. -Paul - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/