Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261459AbVCCRqi (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Mar 2005 12:46:38 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261657AbVCCRpv (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Mar 2005 12:45:51 -0500 Received: from sta.galis.org ([66.250.170.210]:39040 "HELO sta.galis.org") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S262540AbVCCRfK (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Mar 2005 12:35:10 -0500 From: "George Georgalis" Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 12:34:59 -0500 To: Linux Kernel Mail List Subject: problem with linux 2.6.11 and sa Message-ID: <20050303173459.GC952@ixeon.local> Reply-To: george@galis.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1703 Lines: 47 Please keep me in cc as I'm not presently subscribed to lkml) I recall a problem a while back with a pipe from /proc/kmsg that was sent by root to a program with a user uid. The fix was to run the logging program as root. Has that protected pipe method been extended since 2.6.8.1? I'm very defiantly seeing a problem with the 2.6.11 kernel and my spamassassin setup. However, it's not clear exactly where the problem is, seems like sa but it might be 2.6.11 with daemontools + qmail + QMAIL_QUEUE. A sure sign of it is no logs (with debug) for remote sa connections which score "0/0" and correct operation with local "cat spam.txt | spamc -R"; fix is to use the older kernel. SA has stopped stdout logging completely with 2.6.11 in addition to the all pass score. But the message seems to go through my temp queue (for testing) and sent on to my local MDA. I'm not sure if it's a sa problem with the kernel or the new kernel doing something new with pipes from tcp connections. Maybe the new kernel is not making files available (eg 0 bytes), until the writing pipe is closed? That would make my SA test a zero byte file, which would pass, close, become full, and the file piped to local MDA is full? ...humm then I'd get a score of "0/5"... this sounds like a SA problem with the new kernel, ideas? // George -- George Georgalis, systems architect, administrator Linux BSD IXOYE http://galis.org/george/ cell:646-331-2027 mailto:george@galis.org - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/