From: "Antonino A. Daplas" <adaplas@hotpop.com>
Reply-To: adaplas@pol.net
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>, adaplas@pol.net
Subject: Re: RFC: disallow modular framebuffers
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 04:37:43 +0800
User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4
Cc: linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20050301024118.GF4021@stusta.de> <200503040350.51163.adaplas@hotpop.com> <20050303202039.GH4608@stusta.de>
In-Reply-To: <20050303202039.GH4608@stusta.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200503040437.43495.adaplas@hotpop.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 882
Lines: 29

On Friday 04 March 2005 04:20, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 03:50:42AM +0800, Antonino A. Daplas wrote:
> >...
> >
> > > Is there any reason for these being three modules?
> > > It seems the best solution would be to make this one module composed of
> > > up to three object files?
> >
> > Yes.
>
> Two possible solutions:
> - rename savagefb.c and link the three files into savagefb.o
> - merge the other two files into savagefb.c
>
> I'd slightly prefer the first choice, but I can send patches for
> whichever you prefer.

I also prefer the first one even if it results into a big patch because
of the rename.

Tony


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/