Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262695AbVCCWYK (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Mar 2005 17:24:10 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262701AbVCCWVR (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Mar 2005 17:21:17 -0500 Received: from clock-tower.bc.nu ([81.2.110.250]:34519 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262660AbVCCWR2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Mar 2005 17:17:28 -0500 Subject: Re: RFD: Kernel release numbering From: Alan Cox To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <1109888144.21780.53.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2) Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 22:15:46 +0000 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1120 Lines: 23 On Mer, 2005-03-02 at 22:21, Linus Torvalds wrote: > - 2.6.: still a stable kernel, but accept bigger changes leading up > to it (timeframe: a month or two). > - 2..x: aim for big changes that may destabilize the kernel for > several releases (timeframe: a year or two) > - .x.x: Linus went crazy, broke absolutely _everything_, and rewrote > the kernel to be a microkernel using a special message-passing version > of Visual Basic. (timeframe: "we expect that he will be released from > the mental institution in a decade or two"). We still need 2.6.x.y updates on a more official footing and with more than one person as the "2.6.x.y" maintainer. I think that is actually more important. The 2.6. thing is essentially irrelevant. You are just relabelling pre and rc to even and odd. It won't fool anyone into testing it more.... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/