Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 7 Nov 2000 22:44:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 7 Nov 2000 22:43:58 -0500 Received: from neodymium.btinternet.com ([194.73.73.83]:49552 "EHLO neodymium.btinternet.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 7 Nov 2000 22:43:51 -0500 From: davej@suse.de Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2000 03:43:34 +0000 (GMT) To: Marty Fouts cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , jmerkey@timpanogas.org Subject: RE: Installing kernel 2.4 In-Reply-To: <52C41B218DE28244B071A1B96DD474F6280154@DC-SRVR1.dotcast.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 7 Nov 2000, Marty Fouts wrote: > There's been a bunch of related work done at the Oregon Graduate Institute > by Calton Pu and others. See > http://www.cse.ogi.edu/DISC/projects/synthetix/publications.html for a list > of papers. The only paper that immediately caught my eye of relevance was the one on dynamic optimization techniques, which is what I assume you were referring to. It's interesting stuff, but I think it'd be a cold day in hell before Linus accepts a dynamic recompiler in kernel space. :) regards, davej. -- | Dave Jones http://www.suse.de/~davej | SuSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/