Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 14:11:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 14:11:00 -0400 Received: from garrincha.netbank.com.br ([200.203.199.88]:19215 "HELO netbank.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 14:10:50 -0400 Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 15:10:31 -0300 (BRST) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: To: "Ernest N. Mamikonyan" Cc: Subject: Re: increasing the TASK_SIZE In-Reply-To: <3B44DA51.10D3F0C0@newton.physics.drexel.edu> Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 5 Jul 2001, Ernest N. Mamikonyan wrote: > I was wondering how I can increase the process address space, TASK_SIZE > (PAGE_OFFSET), in the current kernel. It looks like the 3 GB value is > hardcoded in a couple of places and is thus not trivial to alter. Is > there any good reason to limit this value at all, why not just have it > be the same as the max addressable space (64 GB)? We have an ix86 SMP > box with 4 GB of RAM and want to be able to allocate all of it to a > single program (physics simulation). I would greatly appreciate any help > on this. The only way to achieve your goal would be to modify the hardware. What you want is not possible due to hardware limitations of the x86 platform. Rik -- Virtual memory is like a game you can't win; However, without VM there's truly nothing to lose... http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ Send all your spam to aardvark@nl.linux.org (spam digging piggy) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/