Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 15:40:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 15:40:46 -0400 Received: from e21.nc.us.ibm.com ([32.97.136.227]:687 "EHLO e21.nc.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 15:40:37 -0400 Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 12:39:36 -0700 From: Jonathan Lahr To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: io_request_lock patch? Message-ID: <20010709123936.E6013@us.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i X-Operating-System: Linux 2.0.32 on an i486 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I have heard that a patch to reduce io_request_lock contention by breaking it into per queue locks was released in the past. Does anyone know where I could find this patch if it exists? Thanks, Jonathan -- Jonathan Lahr IBM Linux Technology Center Beaverton, Oregon lahr@us.ibm.com 503-578-3385 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/