Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 11:36:26 +0000
From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: davej@redhat.com, torvalds@osdl.org, jgarzik@pobox.com,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RFD: Kernel release numbering
Message-ID: <20050304113626.E3932@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
Mail-Followup-To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, davej@redhat.com,
	torvalds@osdl.org, jgarzik@pobox.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0503021340520.25732@ppc970.osdl.org> <20050302230634.A29815@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <42265023.20804@pobox.com> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0503021553140.25732@ppc970.osdl.org> <20050303002733.GH10124@redhat.com> <20050302203812.092f80a0.akpm@osdl.org> <20050304105247.B3932@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20050304032632.0a729d11.akpm@osdl.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i
In-Reply-To: <20050304032632.0a729d11.akpm@osdl.org>; from akpm@osdl.org on Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 03:26:32AM -0800
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1876
Lines: 43

On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 03:26:32AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 08:38:12PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >  > Grump.  Have all these regressions received the appropriate level of
> >  > visibility on this mailing list?
> > 
> >  Looking at the http://l4x.org/k/ site, it appears that all -mm versions
> >  have broken ARM support with the defconfig, while Linus kernels at least
> >  build fine.
> 
> It's very much in an arch maintainer's interest to make sure that
> cross-compilers are easily obtainable.  Any hints?

Been trying to achieve that since it's a FAQ on ARM lists.  Even gone to
the extent of setting up a separate mailing list, getting a volunteer to
track what people want and do the hard work to build them.  That was
about 6 months ago, and I haven't seen any results.

I was thinking at the time "great, this is one problem which should be
solved".  How silly of me.  It seems, yet again, that it comes down to
a case of "if rmk doesn't do it, it won't get done."  Sad but true.
Now, why do I keep feeling that I'm being taken advantage of all the
time?  Could it be the complete lack of productive help from anyone else.

Anyway, going back to why -mm doesn't work:

 arch/arm/kernel/built-in.o(.init.text+0xb64): In function `$a':
 : undefined reference to `rd_size'
 make[1]: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1

So "rd_size" got deleted in -mm kernels without reference to anyone else
who's using it.  Greeeeaaatttt....

-- 
Russell King
 Linux kernel    2.6 ARM Linux   - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
 maintainer of:  2.6 Serial core
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/