Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 15:53:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 15:53:26 -0400 Received: from sal.qcc.sk.ca ([198.169.27.3]:9998 "HELO sal.qcc.sk.ca") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 15:53:16 -0400 Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 13:53:16 -0600 From: Charles Cazabon To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: NFS Client patch Message-ID: <20010709135316.A9731@qcc.sk.ca> In-Reply-To: <15177.65286.592796.329570@charged.uio.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: ; from soules@happyplace.pdl.cmu.edu on Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 03:45:36PM -0400 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Craig Soules wrote: > > Ok, perhaps I mis-spoke slightly. What the spec does state is that the > cookie is opaque. This has generally been interpreted to mean that you > should not trust it to be stable after a change to that directory. I thought the generally accepted meaning of "opaque" in this context was "don't expect to be able to infer anything relevant from this data". This has nothing to do with how long a particular cookie is valid. Charles -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Charles Cazabon GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/